From the Introduction
“We strongly believe that the central part of any science lesson or learning sequence is a well-crafted and executed explanation.
“But we are also aware that many – if not most – teachers have had very little training in how to actually go about crafting or executing their explanations. As advocates of evidence-informed teaching, we hope to bring a new perspective and set of skills to your teaching and empower you to take your place in the classroom as the imparter of knowledge.
“We do, however, wish to put paid to the suspicion that we advocate science lessons to be all chalk and talk: we strongly urge that teachers should use targeted and interactive questioning, model answers, practical work, guided practice and supported individual student practice in tandem with ‘teacher talk’. There is a time when the teacher should be a ‘guide on the side’ but the main focus of this book is to enable you to shine when you are called to be a science ‘sage on the stage’.
[…] “For many years, it seems that teacher explanation has been taken for granted. In a nation-wide focus on pedagogy, activity, student-led learning and social constructivism, the role of the teacher in taking challenging material and explaining it has been de-emphasised, with discovery, enquiry, peer-to-peer tuition and ‘figuring things out for yourself’ becoming ascendant. Not only that, but a significant number of influential organisations and individuals championed the cause of ‘talk-less teaching’ where the teacher was relegated to a near-voiceless ‘guide on the side’, sometimes enforced by observers with a stopwatch and an inflexible ‘teacher talk’ time limit.
“We earnestly hope that such egregious excesses are now a thing of the past; but we must admit that all too often, the mistakes engendered by well-meaning edu-initiatives live on, while whatever good they achieved lies composting with the CPD packs from ancient training days. Even if they are a thing of the past, there has been a collective deskilling when it comes to the crafting of a science explanation – there is little institutional wisdom and few, if any, resources for teachers to use as a reference.”
And that is one reason why we wrote the book.
What follows is an example of how we discuss a teaching sequence in the book.
Viewing waves through the lens of concrete to abstract progression
Many students have a concrete idea of a wave as something ‘wavy’ i.e. something with crests and troughs. However, in a normal teaching sequence we often shift from a wave profile representation to a wavefront representation to a ray diagram representation with little or no explanation — is it any wonder that some students get confused?
I have found it useful to consider the sequence from wave profile to wavefront to ray as representations that move from the concrete and familiar representation of waves as something that looks ‘wavy’ (wave profile) to something that looks less wavy (wavefront) to something more abstract that doesn’t look at all ‘wavy’ (ray diagram) as summarised in the table below.
Each row of the table shows the same situation represented by different conventions and it is important that students recognise this. You can quiz students to check they understand this idea. For example:
- Top row: which part of the wave do the straight lines in the middle picture represent? (The crests of the waves.)
- Top row: why are the rays in the last picture parallel? (To show that the waves are not spreading out.)
- Middle row: compare the viewpoints in the first and middle picture. (The first is ‘from the side’, the middle is ‘from above, looking down.’)
- Middle row: why are the rays in the last picture not parallel? (Because the waves are spreading out in a circular pattern.)
Once students are familiar with this shift in perspective, we can use to explain more complex phenomena such as refraction.
For example, we begin with the wave profile representation (most concrete and familiar to most students) and highlight the salient features.
Next, we move on to the same situation represented as wavefronts (more abstract).
Finally, we move on to the most abstract ray diagram representation.
‘Cracking Key Concepts in Secondary Science’ is available in multiple formats from Amazon and Sage Publishing. You can also order the paperback and hardback versions direct from your local bookshop 🙂
We hope you enjoy the book and find it useful.
STOP PRESS! 25% discount!
This is only available if you order directly from SAGE Publishing before 31/12/2021 and some terms and conditions apply (see SAGE website).
- Go to https://uk.sagepub.com/
- Search for ‘Cracking Key Concepts’
- Enter the discount code ‘UK21AUTHOR’ at the checkout.
- Wait for your copy to be delivered post-haste by Royal Mail.
Reblogged this on The Echo Chamber.
Pleased to see, displayed here from the book, some of the Physics in preview form. I note that the Amazon link leads two different ones: the start and index via the Paperback preview, and via the Kindle button a section of the Biology portion is added. The Sage Publishing link takes you to more, including a chunk of the Chemistry. The latter is clearly sourced from Google (Books), but seems to display more than is available on the Google Books Preview website.
Furthermore, I learned from the above that waves at the sea shore are slower than out in the deep.
Absolutely! The bottom of the wave is slower than the top so that’s why it “breaks” in that distinctive form 🙂
I’m very proud of you, Geth. ILYF xxxx
Thank you, my lovely ILYE xxxx